Re: Enhancement Request
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Enhancement Request |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANzqJaDC7tMFAG-AJ_XdWfSLz0hGYEfAyPAJY5jy81bHm1r-wA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Enhancement Request (Olivier Gautherot <ogautherot@gautherot.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Enhancement Request
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:50 AM Olivier Gautherot <ogautherot@gautherot.net> wrote:
El jue, 1 feb 2024 2:35, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> escribió:On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 3:51 PM Hajek, Nick <Nick.Hajek@vishay.com> wrote:[snip]The IN predicate is only efficient for a very small number of elements, supported by an index. People (including me) who would find DELETE FROM .. LIMIT TO ... useful want to delete a *lot* of rows (but not all in one giant statement).Deleting large numbers of rows is a complex task with a lot of hidden issues (index management between other things). Adding a LIMIT paradigm will not simplify it in any way.
Smaller "bites" are easier to manage than giant bites.
I remember doing it on tables with over 50 millions rows and had my share of disaster recoveries. Partitions saved my life.
You must have been doing something wrong.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: