Re: B-tree index balance?
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: B-tree index balance? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANzqJaCmG88ew6zBDtZWa9pGFEhq7SbD2NO5r48y37D0cYxwQQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: B-tree index balance? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:37 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes:
> On an RDMS which I used in the 1990s and 2000s, b-tree indices of sequences
> would get unbalanced, since every new leaf was added to the far right
> corner of the tree.
> Sure, they would auto-balance *to a degree* during node splits, but all
> those "far-right corner" inserts still left them pretty lopsided.
> Thus, they provided a utility which we could use to determine the
> lopsidedness, and thus decide when to rebuild an index.
> Does Postgresql keep b-tree indexes on sequences fully balanced? If not,
> how do I see how unbalanced they are? (Assume PG12+.)
As far as I know, we don't have a problem of that sort. Continued
insertions will eventually force a split of the root node, which will
rebalance the tree.
Thanks for the explanation.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: