Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
| От | Matthieu Rigal |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANygOGMT+fDUAGUdA7YdYVLoQRV3+3M0foST-F9QsZveoB6DDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? (Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
|
| Список | psycopg |
I do also second that opinion. Also, the problem of "3" being connotated in Python is fading out. Nobody should be scared by a "3" anymore...
My 3.9 cents
Le mer. 11 nov. 2020 à 09:30, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de> a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 PM Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan@gmail.com> wrote:As long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems better.New users will interpret psycopg2 as "more advanced psycopg".I second that opinion. Also, a suggestion to skip "3" and go with "4" doesn't seem to help against the Python version confusion concern, assuming there is Python4 in some (distant?) future.My 3¢,--Alex
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: