Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status
От | Dhruv Ahuja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANv0W22zdexMQyMMvnqEqEoy1wVZA3QCaX01dbzZnoL06vbLmA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | "pg_ctl promote" exit status (Dhruv Ahuja <dhruvahuja@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Don't think the attachment made it in the last mail. Attaching now.
On 25 January 2013 18:33, Dhruv Ahuja <dhruvahuja@gmail.com> wrote:
May I propose the attached patch.Points to note and possibly discuss:(a) Only exit codes in do_* functions have been changed.(b) The link to, and the version of, LSB specifications has been updated.(c) A significant change is the exit code of do_stop() on stopping a stopped server. Previous return is 1. Proposed return is 0. If this is accepted, I would highly suggest a mention in the Release Notes.(d) The exit code that raised this issue was the return of promoting a promoted server. If promotion fails because the server is running but not as standby, should that be considered a case of starting a started service, or an application specific failure? I am equally weighted to opt for the former, but have proposed differently in the patch.On 23 October 2012 17:29, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:That doesn't seem like a bad idea. Got a patch?On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Dhruv Ahuja <dhruvahuja@gmail.com> wrote:
> The "pg_ctl promote" command returns an exit code of 1 when the server
> is not in standby mode, and the same exit code of 1 when the server
> isn't started at all. The only difference at the time being is the
> string output at the time, which FYI are...
>
> pg_ctl: cannot promote server; server is not in standby mode
>
> ...and...
>
> pg_ctl: PID file "/var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data/postmaster.pid" does not exist
> Is server running?
>
> ...respectively.
>
> I am in the process of developing a clustering solution around luci
> and rgmanager (in Red Hat EL 6) and for the time being, am basing it
> off the string output. Maybe each different exit reason should have a
> unique exit code, whatever my logic and approach to solving this
> problem be?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: