Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
От | Hamid Akhtar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANugjhs2p89jgC9LKp3g6AT_P0-ViHaJpJhX2q06vKp=KT0Qyg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2020, at 19:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am sure that nobody is arguing that the patch has to be beneficial
> in all cases in order to justify applying it. However, there are
> several good arguments against proceding with this patch:
This thread has stalled with no resolution to the raised issues, and the latest
version of the patch (v15) posted no longer applies (I only tried 0001 which
failed, the green tick in the CFBot is due it mistakenlt thinking an attached
report is a patch). I'm marking this patch Returned with Feedback. Please
open a new CF entry when there is a new version of the patch.
cheers ./daniel
I think this is fair. There are quite a few valid points raised by Robert.
Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan)
URL : www.highgo.ca
ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC
CELL:+923335449950 EMAIL: mailto:hamid.akhtar@highgo.ca
URL : www.highgo.ca
ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC
CELL:+923335449950 EMAIL: mailto:hamid.akhtar@highgo.ca
SKYPE: engineeredvirus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: