Re: [GENERAL] Non-overlapping updates blocking each other
От | Melvin Davidson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Non-overlapping updates blocking each other |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANu8FiwkupSxCdtZF4CRvtVEmGKHmbgqNN2POuh3hawF3War1w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Non-overlapping updates blocking each other (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Non-overlapping updates blocking each other
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
Melvin Davidson schrieb am 14.10.2017 um 17:32:More than likely, the optimizer has determined that a table scan is best, in which case it will use a table lock.
That means one updates will be blocking each other.
Since when does Postgres lock the whole table during an update?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>Since when does Postgres lock the whole table during an update?
When the optimizer thinks it needs to do a TABLE SCAN!
--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: