Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information
От | Melvin Davidson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANu8Fiw9oyL_OoosZHpr0QgvTavaGPFHcREaou1peOcY5d2iYQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information (Jack Christensen <jack@jackchristensen.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle,
looking for feature comparison information
|
Список | pgsql-general |
In addition to the other great comments and advice that have been posted, you might want to review the "Database Compatibility Technology for Oracle" document from EnterpriseDB.
http://www.enterprisedb.com/solutions/oracle-compatibility-technology
http://www.enterprisedb.com/solutions/oracle-compatibility-technology
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Jack Christensen <jack@jackchristensen.com> wrote:
On 05/09/2015 06:33 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:Temporary tables will be in memory unless they overflow work_mem and we do support unlogged tables and tablespaces which you could stick out on a ramdisk if you want.I would suggest not putting a table space on a ramdisk. According to the docs this risks corrupting the entire cluster.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/manage-ag-tablespaces.html
Jack
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: