Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not?

> Could you summarize here what you have done to achieve test
>  stabilization in your new patch set posted at [1] without using the
>  proposal of this thread?

Mostly idea is next:

Let's imagine we have two steps - step_before and step_after which may end in either order.

Then instead of such step/markers structure:

        step_before(step_after)

        stepN

        stepN+1

        step_after

use the next:

In the first case, there are two possible results:

1) step_before is finished before step_after - reported as step_before, step_after

2) step_after is launched before step_before ends - reported as step_after, step_before

But in the case second variant:

So, the second option provides the same result regardless of order of finishing of step_before and step_after, which is the thing I want to achieve here.

Best regards,

Mikhail.