Re: PGconn and fork
От | Rodrigo Barboza |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGconn and fork |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANs8QJbYdhwVfVozntnKZUovqx69x0LtoQYFVNOtO9HTG0ZcvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGconn and fork (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
No, the child process will just have another reference to the openRodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj@gmail.com> writes:
> I have a program in C, the createas a connection, do stuff, fork, exit
> child and continues life.
> Supose that when I create de PGconn, I have 1 active connection in postgres.
> When I fork, does it count as a second connection? I mean, will postrges
> interpretate 2 active connections or they only share the same connection?
> I know that if the child process execute some query, I can get unexpected
> results, but it doesn't, so I am safe about that.
> I'm only worried that this can increase the number of connections and reach
> the limit of max_connections.
socket that connects to the server. The reason why it's dangerous
to send queries from such a process is exactly that, to the server,
it looks like the same connection as the parent process.
regards, tom lane
Perfect.
Thanks, Tom!
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: