Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
От | Yuriy Zhuravlev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANiD2e9Ss0y75V7uXmJ=2m6gvqtTOvg8+vPo3a6D1Min5D-WQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2018-05-03 9:32 GMT+09:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
On 2018-05-03 09:29:32 +0900, Yuriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that unsubstantiated hyperbole is the right way to
> > approach the task of convincing the community to adopt the approach
> > you prefer.
>
>
> It's not a hyperbole it's fact and I even talked about it on conference.
> You should just compare all my cmake files with Makefile+.in+.m4 (and msvc
> folder) it was significant reduce code to maintain.
> Anyway all my intention in this field it's to reduce pain and reduce suppor
> time for build system.
> Curren state:
>
> cat `find ./ | grep '\.in\|\.m4\|Makefile\|\/msvc\/'` | wc
> 22942 76111 702163
>
> cat `find ./ | grep 'CMakeLists\|\.cmake'` | wc
> 9160 16604 278061
Given that you don't have feature parity this just seems like trolling.
I have. I have some lacks with .po generation and documentation but all! other features same, I even can run tap tests.
Look into my task issue list https://github.com/stalkerg/postgres_cmake/issues it's can increase number of lines maximum on 10%.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: