On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 17:18, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/5/23 08:14, Shlok Kyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> As for the test results, I very much doubt the differences are not
> >> caused simply by random timing variations, or something like that. And I
> >> don't understand what "Performance Machine Linux" is, considering those
> >> timings are slower than the other two machines.
> >
> > The machine has Total Memory of 755.536 GB, 120 CPUs and RHEL 7 Operating System
> > Also find the detailed info of the performance machine attached.
> >
>
> Thanks for the info. I don't think the tests really benefit from this
> much resources, I would be rather surprised if it was faster beyond 8
> cores or so. The CPU frequency likely matters much more. Which probably
> explains why this machine was the slowest.
>
> Also, I wonder how much the results vary between the runs. I suppose you
> only did s single run for each, right?
I did 10 runs for each of the cases and reported the median result in
the previous thread.
I have documented the result of the runs and have attached the same here.
Thanks and Regards,
Shlok Kyal