Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
От | Shlok Kyal |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANhcyEU9Bq9G7ib1ZH7Zp=LN_M-d7=PrDG9NcDhe5JRi6dwedg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition (Sergey Tatarintsev <s.tatarintsev@postgrespro.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 09:43, Sergey Tatarintsev <s.tatarintsev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > 07.04.2025 03:27, Álvaro Herrera пишет: > > On 2025-Apr-01, Shlok Kyal wrote: > > I have modified the comment in create_publication.sgml and also added > comment in the restrictions section of logical-replication.sgml. > I have also added a more detailed explanation in comment of > 'check_foreign_tables' > > I have attached the updated v11 patch. > > Sadly I don't have time to describe the changes proposed here right now, > but I'll do that early tomorrow. (Some minor changes are still needed, > particularly the comments to publication_check_foreign_parts which are > mostly unchanged from what your patch has. I'll do another review round > tomorrow.) > > Hello! > > I looked at the latest patch again and found one more place for list_free(). Also look at additional test case: > > diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c index 51e463c112b..7fcc191feb9100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c @@ -442,6+442,7 @@ GetPubPartitionOptionRelations(List *result, PublicationPartOpt pub_partopt, result= lappend_oid(result, partOid); } + list_free(all_parts); } else result = lappend_oid(result, relid); diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sqlindex 49c9d98b668..e56aebc397a 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql +++b/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql @@ -1296,6 +1296,14 @@ SELECT pubname, tablename FROM pg_publication_tables WHEREschemaname in ('sch3' -- foreign partition ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 SET (publish_via_partition_root); +CREATE SCHEMAsch5; +CREATE SCHEMA sch6; +CREATE TABLE sch6.tmain(id int) PARTITION BY RANGE(id); +CREATE TABLE sch5.part1 PARTITIONOF sch6.tmain FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (10) PARTITION BY RANGE(id); +CREATE FOREIGN TABLE sch6.part2 PARTITION OFsch5.part1 FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (5) SERVER fdw_server; +CREATE PUBLICATION pub4 FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA sch5 WITH (publish_via_partition_root);+SELECT pubname, tablename FROM pg_publication_tables WHERE pubname = 'pub4' ORDER BY pubname,tablename; + DROP PUBLICATION pub1; DROP PUBLICATION pub2; DROP PUBLICATION pub3; > > I think this is a wrong assumption: > > ScanKeyInit(&key[keycount++], Anum_pg_class_relispartition, BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_BOOLEQ, BoolGetDatum(false)); > > In this case sch5.part1 is partitioned table, but it also partition of table in different schema > Hi Sergey, Thanks for reviewing the patch. I have addressed the comment in the latest patch shared in [1]. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANhcyEW0QMiJXMqpPFRHni-q0Rm4R0hpZ0LdaqA%3DF3wvDUU6sQ%40mail.gmail.com Thanks and Regards, Shlok Kyal
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: