Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANbhV-HbnZMsBU3Bqxt_VvymuOm=9FdDsZkiCAeZ6fLXRtQWZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:12 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:31 PM Simon Riggs > <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > I attach both clean and compare versions. > > > > Do we want to hold this work for PG15 or commit in PG14 and backpatch > it till v10 where we have made hash indexes crash-safe? I would vote > for committing in PG14 and backpatch it till v10, however, I am fine > if we want to commit just to PG14 or PG15. Backpatch makes sense to me, but since not everyone will be reading this thread, I would look towards PG15 only first. We may yet pick up additional corrections or additions before a backpatch, if that is agreed. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: