Re: Middleware Messages for FE/BE
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Middleware Messages for FE/BE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANbhV-EjPiJBQWyAqFq6_zgGje_RG0cTfDQP8Znid7LxULbZaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Middleware Messages for FE/BE (Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 10:33, Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com> wrote: > > Need for this does come up quite often so I very much support this. > > In addition to keeping a registry there likely need to be some other > "generally agreed" rules as well, like > * it being safe to ignore any and all of the middleware messages (at > least with no degradation from the state of not having them) > * and maybe even a standard way to turn them on and off. > > On/Off switch could be of course done using flags for each > individual use case, but it would be good to agree conventions. Good feedback and thoughts, thanks. Based on your interest, I will begin to code, but won't be ready for Sept CF. > Another thing to agree would be a set of standard messages, like "I am > overloaded, consider moving some load away" or "Planning to switch > over to replica x.x.x.x, please follow" That sounds like a server->middleware message and existing mechanisms might work for that already. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: