Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANbhV-ED5xULjQ31kNufRWa3xiKti0TNaJGhzxn0+fRf7CCv8Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 19:15, Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com> wrote: > we suggest that as an improvement compression should be put inside the Toaster as an option, > thus the Toaster could have maximum benefits from knowledge of data internal structure (and in future use JSON Schema). Very much agreed. > For using in special Toaster for JSON datatype compression dictionaries seem to be very valuable addition, but now I > have to agree that this feature in current state is competing with Pluggable TOAST. But I don't understand this. Why does storing a compression dictionary in the catalog prevent that dictionary from being used within the toaster? -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: