Re: [Bug] Usage of stale dead_items pointer in parallel vacuum

On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 11:17 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can reproduce the issue and confirm that your patch fixes it.  I
> didn't use your custom malloc allocator but instead applied a
> redundant palloc0 for TidStore in TidStoreCreateShared(), hoping to
> get a different chunk of memory (haha).

I'm starting to wonder if we should have something similar to that
allocator in core, which is actually here and not in the link
upthread:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/193261e2c4d.3dd3cd7c1842.871636075166132237@zohocorp.com

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services