On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:40 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 5:33 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've looked around and it seems clang is more lax on conversions.
> > Since it works fine for clang, I think we just need a cast here for
> > gcc. I've attached a blind attempt at a fix -- I'll apply shortly
> > unless someone happens to test and find it doesn't work.
>
> I've reproduced the same error on my raspberry pi, and confirmed the
> patch fixes the error.
>
> My previous idea was wrong. With my proposal, the regression test for
> radix tree failed on my raspberry pi. On the other hand, with your
> patch the tests passed.
Pushed, and at least parula's green now, thanks for testing! And
thanks, Andres, for the ping!