Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANWCAZa9=F4W_G11czVPNBEjOAN3AQ_TW5kS5wQ7jzp5aNGiog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:02 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:41 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > A few ARM buildfarm animals are complaining: > > > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A02 > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=snakefly&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A34%3A03 > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=massasauga&dt=2024-03-06%2007%3A33%3A18 > > > > The error message we got is: > > ../../src/include/port/simd.h:326:71: error: incompatible type for > argument 1 of \342\200\230vshrq_n_s8\342\200\231 > uint8x16_t masked = vandq_u8(vld1q_u8(mask), (uint8x16_t) vshrq_n_s8(v, 7)); > ^ > > Since 'v' is uint8x16_t I think we should have used vshrq_n_u8() instead. That sounds plausible, and I'll look further. (Hmm, I thought we had run this code on Arm already...)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: