Re: [HACKERS] On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jLpn2PJFR6bQAYiVfXcFyq6J0=2dwc9oAG4Wh9cNi12Xw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] On-disk format of SCRAM verifiers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 April 2017 at 14:42, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> SCRAM-SHA-256$<iteration count>:<salt>$<StoredKey>:<ServerKey> >>> >>> Could you explain where you are looking? I don't see that in RFC5803 >> > >From 1. Overview: > > Yeah, it's not easy to see, I missed it earlier too. You have to look at RFC 5803 and RFC 3112 together. RFC 3112 saysthat the overall format is "<scheme>$<authInfo>$<authValue>", and RFC5803 says that for SCRAM, scheme is "SCRAM-SHA-256"(for our variant), authInfo is "<iteration count>:<salt>" and authValue is "<StoredKey>:<ServerKey>" > > They really should've included examples in those RFCs. Thanks +1 for change -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: