Re: Reloptions for table access methods
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reloptions for table access methods |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jLk9hs9UYEdnudi2QcrcOZ4X0ubFJk3_0-TKGDEv7wq6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reloptions for table access methods (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reloptions for table access methods
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 1 Sept 2020 at 18:21, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > I went with the simple approach because fixing that problem seemed a > bit over-engineered. Here are some thoughts on what we could do: The simple patch is admirable, but not something we should put into core. I definitely don't agree with the premise that all existing heap options should be common across all new or extension tableAMs. There are dozens of such options and I don't believe that they would all have meaning in all future storage plugins. I think options should just work exactly the same for Indexes and Tables. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: