Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jLFtRWihDa50Ud-X8ZTcEhXCHEkqF3=sU5zqiKWhOyrnw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 August 2016 at 04:39, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am relaunching $subject as 10 development will begin soon. As far as > I know, there is agreement that we can do something here. Among the > different proposals I have found: > - pg_clog renamed to pg_commit_status, pg_xact or pg_commit > - pg_xlog renamed to pg_xjournal, pg_wal or pg_journal Don't mean to be a party pooper, but what discussion and agreement are we referring to here? If we are going to suggest doing something we really should summarize the reason for doing it rather than assume it is self evident, cos it certainly isn't. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: