Re: Entities created in one query not available in another in extended protocol
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Entities created in one query not available in another in extended protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jL2Loyf6tj4VkfTihAe+hjJSTKpt4JWGu_+zE3c4RmAvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Entities created in one query not available in another in extended protocol (Shay Rojansky <roji@roji.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Entities created in one query not available in another in extended protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11 June 2015 at 22:12, Shay Rojansky <roji@roji.org> wrote:
--
Thanks everyone for your time (or rather sorry for having wasted it).Just in case it's interesting to you... The reason we implemented things this way is in order to avoid a deadlock situation - if we send two queries as P1/D1/B1/E1/P2/D2/B2/E2, and the first query has a large resultset, PostgreSQL may block writing the resultset, since Npgsql isn't reading it at that point. Npgsql on its part may get stuck writing the second query (if it's big enough) since PostgreSQL isn't reading on its end (thanks to Emil Lenngren for pointing this out originally).
That part does sound like a problem that we have no good answer to. Sounds worth starting a new thread on that.
Of course this isn't an excuse for anything, we're looking into ways of solving this problem differently in our driver implementation.ShayOn Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:On 11 June 2015 at 16:56, Shay Rojansky <roji@roji.org> wrote:Npgsql (currently) sends Parse for the second command before sending Execute for the first one.
Look no further than that.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: