[HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jKitBSrB7oTgT9CY2i1ObfOt36z0XMraQc+Xrz8QB0nXA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 [HACKERS] Mapping MERGE onto CTEs (Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm working on re-submitting MERGE for PG11 Earlier thoughts on how this could/could not be done were sometimes imprecise or inaccurate, so I have gone through the command per SQL:2011 spec and produced a definitive spec in the form of an SGML ref page. This is what I intend to deliver for PG11. MERGE will use the same mechanisms as INSERT ON CONFLICT, so concurrent behavior does not require further infrastructure changes, just detailed work on the statement itself. I'm building up the code from scratch based upon the spec, rather than trying to thwack earlier attempts into shape. This looks more likely to yield a commitable patch. Major spanners or objections, please throw them in now cos I don't see any. Questions? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: