Re: [HACKERS] Race between SELECT and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Race between SELECT and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jKYX8ZXihHNO+G=eLtyEsvTCEJFnz6Y_p8aHgfH7Sps0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Race between SELECT and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Race between SELECT and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 June 2017 at 10:16, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > BTW, in the partitioned table case, the parent is always locked first > using an AccessExclusiveLock. There are other considerations in that case > such as needing to recreate the partition descriptor upon termination of > inheritance (both the DETACH PARTITION and also DROP TABLE child cases). Is this requirement documented or in comments anywhere? I can't see anything about that, which is a fairly major usage point. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: