Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jKUjUgUYrtS3iLxTsQk_3f-9WFetdDj4cLOa4gMg-A+Sw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 January 2018 at 09:54, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > Sorry, issue with documentation is fixed. OK, thanks. Patch appears to work cleanly now. I'm wondering now about automatically inferring "recheck_on_update = true" for certain common datatype/operators. It doesn't need to be an exhaustive list, but it would be useful if we detected the main use case of (JSONB datatype column)->>CONSTANT Seems like we could do a test to see if the index function is FUNCTION(COLUMNNAME, CONSTANTs...) {JSONB, ->>} or {jsonb_object_field_text(Columnname, Constant)} {substring(Columname, Constants...)} It would be a shame if people had to remember to use this for the common and obvious cases. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: