Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jKPQZr16TBzF0O9wsOWEn5b=PCgCf=TDHKbev873QSN5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 March 2017 at 05:29, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Just to confirm, you want the output to look like this >>> \d+ t1 >>> Table "public.t1" >>> Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default | Storage | Stats >>> target | Description >>> --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+------------- >>> a | integer | | not null | | plain | | >>> Partition key: RANGE (a) >>> Partitions: t1p1 FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (100), HAS PARTITIONS >>> t1p2 FOR VALUES FROM (100) TO (200) > >> >> lowercase please > > Except for HAS PARTITIONS, everything is part of today's output. Given > the current output, HAS PARTITIONS should be in upper case. "has partitions" is not part of the DDL, whereas "FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (100)" is. So ISTM sensible to differentiate between DDL and non-ddl using upper and lower case. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: