Re: Removing the TRACE_SORT macro
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Removing the TRACE_SORT macro |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jK8hh9EAHnLw+sQA4=f3oGzWzpDDjQAvWmW17nh9vHGOQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Removing the TRACE_SORT macro (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Removing the TRACE_SORT macro
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11 April 2016 at 21:43, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
--
Currently, debug instrumentation for sorting is only available if the
TRACE_SORT macro was defined when PostgreSQL was compiled. It is
defined by default, and so in practice it's always available; there is
really no upside to disabling it. "18.17. Developer Options" notes
this restriction for trace_sort, which is the only such restriction.
The number of TRACE_SORT elog() logging callers has grown
significantly in the past couple of releases. The associated "#ifdef
TRACE_SORT" crud has also grown.
I propose that we completely remove the TRACE_SORT macro, and all the
associated crud. Just having that as an option suggests that there is
some possible upside to disabling trace_sort, which is clearly not
true. I will write a patch doing this if there are no objections. I
think this is justifiable as clean-up for 9.6.
Yeh, sort has changed enough now that fixes weren't going to backpatch cleanly, so its a good time to do cleanup.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: