Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANP8+jK5uYdryYx=gapmhQzEVL=24x7cEASPu1d4NRbzta-j1w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 August 2015 at 14:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
--
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 19 August 2015 at 12:55, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
>> Please don't be rush. :-)
> Please explain what rush you see?
Yours. You appear to be in a hurry to apply patches that there's no
consensus on.
I think that comment is unreasonable.
The problem was reported 2 months ago; following independent confirmation of the proposed patch, I suggested committing it, with these words:
"If there are no objections, I will apply the patch for 2) to HEAD and backpatch to 9.5."
I was clearly waiting for objections before acting, to test whether there was consensus or not.
Please explain what procedure you would like committers to follow?
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: