Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jJicd4wYjrWTK2zGqJed-X5AcFqHef8GkXegj-2w+-eMQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@ ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 14:36, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
On 7/30/19 8:16 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 22:57, Nasby, Jim <nasbyj@amazon.com
> <mailto:nasbyj@amazon.com>> wrote:
>
> At pgCon we had an BoF for projects/companies that are maintaining
> either forks of Postgres (ie: Aurora Postgres, EDB, Greenplum, BDR),
> or extensions that interact heavily with internals (ie: Citus,
> TimescaleDB). We’d like to have a mailing list to facilitate further
> discussion in this area.____
>
>
> BDR3 is not a fork of Postgres, but it is an extension.
On that note, I'd be a +1 for "pgsql-extensions" as it would certainly
help facilitate above suggested communication. It would be all
encompassing of extensions, forks, etc.
Sounds like a better name and focus.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: