Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why we lost Uber as a user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jJYJUCr5L_gAkdtjZ_1s3py+GsYS5NoV+mejx=s0YaSWw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why we lost Uber as a user (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 29 July 2016 at 15:44, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > All very hand-wavy, of course, and it'd make sense to make the concept > work for BRIN before we consider anything else, but it seems like there > could be a use-case for allowing indexes other than BRIN to be built in > a way that allows HOT updates to happen, thus eliminating the cost of > having to update those indexes when the tuple is changed, in many cases. > Of course, those indexes couldn't be used UNIQUE indexes or used for > primary keys, and adjusting the parameters to a BRIN index you could > possibly get a similar index, but this might allow such an index to > still be usable for index-only scans, which a BRIN index will never be > able to provide. This idea is vaguely similar to the concepts I've been working on, based on earlier work in 2007. I'm starting a new post for a full discussion. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: