Re: WAL consistency check facility
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jJXWQyK0s588rkxLypuceTmzYF9dpNsPUyaCuWDFyyahg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL consistency check facility (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 September 2016 at 17:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > The primary audience of this feature is PostgreSQL developers I have spoken to users who are waiting for this feature to run in production, which is why I suggested it. Some people care more about correctness than they do about loss of performance. Obviously, this would be expensive and those with a super high performance requirement may not be able to take advantage of this. I'm sure many people will turn it off once if they hit a performance issue, but running it in production for the first few months will give people a very safe feeling. I think the primary use for an rmgr filter might well be PostgreSQL developers. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: