Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANP8+j+vwu4UK+zJV-wUE=8x1FeFTQKArZ07qDnFm0yu5FMpKg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 29 June 2015 at 18:11, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Forming a list, like we use for sync rep and having just a single process walk the queue was the way I suggested then and previously.
--
On June 29, 2015 7:02:10 PM GMT+02:00, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote:
>On 29 June 2015 at 16:27, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks to Robert Haas for having discussion (offlist) about the idea
>> and suggestions to improve it and also Andres Freund for having
>> discussion and sharing thoughts about this idea at PGCon.
>>
>
>Weird. This patch is implemented exactly the way I said to implement it
>publicly at PgCon.
>
>Was nobody recording the discussion at the unconference??
Amit presented an earlier version of this at the in unconference?
Yes, I know. And we all had a long conversation about how to do it without waking up the other procs.
Weird.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: