Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+j+SgSShsRNFoRPXh1c0yp3D1R=H-uUkQotnAG+COVapow@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 February 2017 at 14:54, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment, partitioned tables have a restriction that prevents > them allowing INSERT ... ON CONFLICT ... statements: > > postgres=# INSERT INTO cities SELECT 1, 'Crawley',105000 ON CONFLICT > (city_id) DO NOTHING; > ERROR: ON CONFLICT clause is not supported with partitioned tables > > Why do we have such a restriction? And what would it take to remove it? Partitioned tables don't yet support a global unique constraint that would be required for support of ON CONFLICT processing. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: