Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all these months

On 26 May 2017 at 08:27, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 2017-05-26 08:58, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> On 26 May 2017 at 07:10, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> - Do you agree this number of failures is far too high?
>>> - Am I the only one finding so many failures?
>>
>>
>> What type of failure are you getting?
>
>
> The failure is that in the result state the replicated tables differ from
> the original tables.

An important point would be note that that this is time dependent.

> I would really like to know it you think that that doesn't amount to
> 'failure'.

Yes, your test has failed.

Even one record on one test is a serious problem and needs to be fixed.

If we can find out what the bug is with a repeatable test case we can fix it.

Could you provide more details? Thanks

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services