Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

On 14 November 2017 at 13:12, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> Here's the remaining bits, rebased.
>
> It's true that Tom and I reviewed patch 0001, as your proposed commit
> message states.  But it's also true that we both said that it probably
> wasn't a good idea.

I don't see any comments from you or Tom about patch 0001, which was
simple refactoring and not much to complain about.

Perhaps there is some confusion about the numbering?

I see that Alvaro had taken your comments on memory contexts into
account in his later patch.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services