Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANP8+j+ADqRJqDJTCYoTyjB7tQt7az1jF4yhYjess+ZV7ocyZQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 14 July 2015 at 15:32, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
--
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 13 July 2015 at 14:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> TBH, I think the right thing to do at this point is to revert the entire
>> patch and send it back for ground-up rework. I think the high-level
>> design is wrong in many ways and I have about zero confidence in most
>> of the code details as well.
> There are no issues relating to security or data loss, just various fixable
> issues in a low-impact feature, which in my view is an important feature
> also.
There is a *very large* amount of work needed here, and I do not hear you
promising to do it.
I thought I had done so clearly enough, happy to do so again.
I promise that either work will be done, or the patch will be reverted. Since I have more time now, I view that as a realistic prospect.
What I'm hearing is stonewalling, and I am not happy.
I'm not sure what you mean by that but it sounds negative and is almost certainly not justified, in this or other cases.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: