Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+j+8c5wN8k-RLDgh1vWr-FT_HubO6rU5w6fdJV2WjyQ=cA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] SQL procedures (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 31 October 2017 at 18:23, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I've been working on SQL procedures. (Some might call them "stored > procedures", but I'm not aware of any procedures that are not stored, so > that's not a term that I'm using here.) I guess that the DO command might have a variant to allow you to execute a procedure that isn't stored? Not suggesting you implement that, just thinking about why/when the "stored" word would be appropriate. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: