Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+j+3U-bHHZsS2gp1zFtGA7rzf4=ieErbsE2LYECfZx5F7w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 January 2017 at 23:22, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> I don't see why that would be unacceptable. If we do it for >> remote_apply, why not also do it for other modes? Whatever the >> reasoning was for remote_apply should work for other modes. I should >> add it was originally designed to be that way by me, so must have been >> changed later. > > You can achieve that with this patch by setting > replication_lag_sample_interval to 0. I wonder why you ignore my mention of the bug in the correct mechanism? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: