Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+j+0JhYs_oK4gGQh4-Ga2m1CmVEUf=4QTr4HUKt7pC8RJw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API (Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 March 2017 at 23:31, Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org> wrote: > On 03/02/2017 07:13 AM, David Steele wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 2/25/17 2:43 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >>> On 25 February 2017 at 13:58, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> - trigger_file is removed. >>>> FWIW, my only complain is about the removal of trigger_file, this is >>>> useful to detect a trigger file on a different partition that PGDATA! >>>> Keeping it costs also nothing.. >>> >>> Sorry, that is just an error of implementation, not intention. I had >>> it on my list to keep, at your request. >>> >>> New version coming up. >> >> Do you have an idea when the new version will be available? > > Please? Having yet another PostgreSQL release go by without fixing > recovery.conf would make me very sad. I share your pain, but there are various things about this patch that make me uncomfortable. I believe we are looking for an improved design not just a different design. I think the best time to commit such a patch is at the beginning of a new cycle, so people have a chance to pick out pieces they don't like and incrementally propose changes. So I am going to mark this MovedToNextCF, barring objections from committers willing to make it happen in this release. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: