Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
| От | Nikolay Samokhvalov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANNMO+LKbriqX5SU5HbuQ9VYqa79YLpN0sM-ErABkcki05RZwg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:43 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
I agree that this matters at the level of whole indexes.
I already realized my mistake – indeed, having multiple errors for 1 index
doesn't seem to be super practically helpful.
I think that that problem should be solved at a higher level, in the
program that runs amcheck. Note that pg_amcheck will already do this
for B-Tree indexes.
That's a great tool, and it's great it supports parallelization, very useful
on large machines.
We should add a "Tip" to the amcheck documentation on 14+ about this.
We should clearly advise users that they should probably just use
pg_amcheck.
and with -j$N, with high $N (unless it's production)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: