Re: Updating IPC::Run in CI?
От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updating IPC::Run in CI? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN55FZ39A5=GUc=ESO03iD7hHTYgzYGF=kydR+PLT5JDLGkfJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updating IPC::Run in CI? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Updating IPC::Run in CI?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Thu, 18 Sept 2025 at 21:18, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2025-09-18 10:08:49 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > > Andres pointed out that one of my new OAuth tests has flaked on NetBSD > > [1]. The final line of debugging output is missing from the stderr > > coming from psql. > > > > I haven't ruled out a bug in my implementation, but I also remembered > > that there was some discussion on the list about stderr being lost by > > IPC::Run in rare circumstances [2], and that particular bug has since > > been fixed [3]. Is it possible to (safely) switch the CI images to use > > the most recent IPC::Run, so we can make use of Noah's fixes? NetBSD > > is currently running 20231003.0. > > A lot of things are safely possible :). > > The stuff that's installed in the images is controlled by a bunch of scripts > in my pg-vm-images repository. For netbsd the relevant install is in > > https://github.com/anarazel/pg-vm-images/blob/main/scripts/bsd/netbsd-prep-postgres.sh > > As you can see we currently don't install packages from outside netbsd's > package repository. We could change that and install IPC::Run via cpan, but > imo it's obviously nicer - and more representative of real world setups - if > we just rely on OS/distro packages. I have not checked it yet but we are on NetBSD 10.0 [1]. I thought upgrading to 10.1 might help... Apparently it does not, 10.1 too uses p5-IPC-Run-20231003 [2]. [1] https://github.com/anarazel/pg-vm-images/blob/main/packer/netbsd.pkrvars.hcl#L58C1-L58C75 [2] https://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/index-all.html -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: