Re: Refactor calculations to use instr_time

Hi,

Thanks for the review.

On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 06:01, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:53:36 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote in
> > Thanks for the review. I updated the patch.
>
>
>         WalUsageAccumDiff(&diff, &pgWalUsage, &prevWalUsage);
> -       PendingWalStats.wal_records = diff.wal_records;
> -       PendingWalStats.wal_fpi = diff.wal_fpi;
> -       PendingWalStats.wal_bytes = diff.wal_bytes;
> ...
> +       WALSTAT_ACC(wal_records, diff);
> +       WALSTAT_ACC(wal_fpi, diff);
> +       WALSTAT_ACC(wal_bytes, diff);
> +       WALSTAT_ACC(wal_buffers_full, PendingWalStats);
>
>
> The lifetime of the variable "diff" seems to be longer now. Wouldn't
> it be clearer if we renamed it to something more meaningful, like
> wal_usage_diff, WalUsageDiff or PendingWalUsage?  Along those same
> lines, it occurs to me that the new struct should be named
> PgStat_PendingWalStats, instead of ..Usage. That change makes the name
> of the type and the variable consistent.

I agree. The patch is updated.

Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft