Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN55FZ2_0_-AJ-bw5JyY1n3jQ2Fue0c+LLaZjwDbM0JrZpNsow@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 19:26, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:33 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe we could try this? > > > > https://man.netbsd.org/mount_tmpfs.8 > > https://man.openbsd.org/mount_tmpfs.8 > > NetBSD's test_world: 10:30 -> 3:23 > OpenBSD test_world: 15:45 - >9:10 Thank you for working on this! These are very nice speedups. > I think NetBSD would finish around 2nd place if turned on by default > like that. The OpenBSD part needs more work though, see attached... + #umount /usr/obj # unused 5G on /dev/sd0j + #swapon /dev/sd0j # fails with ENXIO... what am I missing? I think I found the problem, sd0j's fstype is not a swap. It worked like that: $ disklabel -E sd0 $ umount /usr/obj $ disklabel -E sd0 # prompts are: m -> j -> \n -> \n -> swap -> w -> q $ disklabel -E sd0 $ swapon /dev/sd0j # runs successfully -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: