Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade
От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN55FZ2Rr9RpdrGk4V3NugqAzQd3_L=+qyT-6401KP9zSt83VA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 08:30, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 05.06.25 12:42, Thomas Munro wrote: > > I think on your C11 thread I might have been confused about that, > > since there was an implication that 2019 might support <stdatomic.h>, > > but it looks like 2019 added language stuff while 2022 added the > > library stuff. But yeah, given your proposal that MSVC 2019 should be > > our new minimum target on that platform, I wonder if we should have > > both available in CI somehow... > > It would be useful to have a leading and a trailing edge CI system for > every OS family. For example, say, Ubuntu 25.04 and RHEL 7, and VS 201x > and VS 202y. Because as we are seeing here, sometimes you're more > concerned about breaking the old one, and sometimes you're more > interested in using a feature on the new one. Maybe one of the two > could be manually triggered to save on resources. I think that is pretty doable. First we need to decide on a list of OS families, though. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: