Re: Indexes documentation bug
От | Kouber Saparev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Indexes documentation bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN4RuQvo-ZAm0HBWLLPp80aSM+15fC4N1bE=iATXzaS9D5ShMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Indexes documentation bug (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
My bad, yes indeed, the view is different.
На пн, 4.04.2022 г. в 17:01 ч. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> написа:
Kouber Saparev <kouber@gmail.com> writes:
> I believe there is an error within this sentence in section
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/monitoring-stats.html#MONITORING-PG-STAT-USER-FUNCTIONS-VIEW
> "Therefore, a bitmap scan increments the
> pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_tup_read count(s)
> for the index(es) it uses, and it increments the pg_stat_all_tables.
> idx_tup_fetch count for the table, but it does not affect
> pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_tup_fetch."
> There is repeated mentioning of pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_tup_fetch while I
> suppose one should read pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_scan instead the second
> time. I.e. bitmap scans do not increment idx_scan.
Um ... you did notice that the mentions of idx_tup_fetch apply to two
different views, pg_stat_all_tables vs pg_stat_all_indexes?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: