Re: Unrecognized exception condition "deprecated_feature"
От | Kouber Saparev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unrecognized exception condition "deprecated_feature" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN4RuQtCwLs4vX6GCCO2_Mdp+kh7gJbY3A-uzB5o4MM0bsbqjw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unrecognized exception condition "deprecated_feature" ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Here's a working example with 'unique_violation' for instance:
postgres=# DO $$
BEGIN
RAISE WARNING 'Example of working exception condition'
USING ERRCODE = 'unique_violation';
END;
$$;
WARNING: Example of working exception condition
DO
postgres=# DO $$
BEGIN
RAISE WARNING 'Example of working exception condition (with code)'
USING ERRCODE = '23505';
END;
$$;
WARNING: Example of working exception condition (with code)
DO
postgres=# select error_severity, message from sqlog.log('today') where sql_state_code = '23505';
error_severity | message
----------------+----------------------------------------------------
WARNING | Example of working exception condition
WARNING | Example of working exception condition (with code)
(2 rows)
2018-03-09 21:00 GMT+02:00 David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>:
For some reason using an error code of 'deprecated_feature' does not work, while its equivalent '01P01' works just fine.kouber=# DO $$BEGINRAISE WARNING 'Deprecated'USING ERRCODE = 'deprecated_feature';END;$$;ERROR: unrecognized exception condition "deprecated_feature"CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 3 at RAISEkouber=# DO $$BEGINRAISE WARNING 'Deprecated'USING ERRCODE = '01P01';[...]kouber@spectre:~/src/postgres$ grep -r deprecated_feature ../src/backend/utils/errcodes.txt:01P01 W ERRCODE_WARNING_DEPRECATED_FE ATURE deprecated_feature I am using PostgreSQL 10.1, I apologize in case it has already been fixed in 10.2 or 10.3.While I haven't looked at the source code or docs for this I'm wondering why you believe this is a bug in the first place. If "01P01" is a valid and expected value for ERRCODE I would expect that the textual string label representing it would not be. The two are not likely to be interchangeable. Have you found working code where this is does work as you expect?David J.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: