Re: Custom oauth validator options
| От | Zsolt Parragi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Custom oauth validator options |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAN4CZFP_2fe2-18wUoXDZodV8suVe9o++pv=hP8KxxvWkmCx7A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Custom oauth validator options (VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Custom oauth validator options
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Overall, +1 that this limitation is real and worth discussing.I’ll plan to send a patch shortly exploring option (b). Personally I would go with either (a) or (c), and I was planning to clean up / improve / share my (c) patch as a second attempt for this thread, if it didn't receive any replies. I can still do that, so that we have multiple test implementations. (b) seemed a not as nice design to me, but maybe you find a better way to implement it than I did. Also now I really like the idea of the PGC_HBA, if there's a way for users to configure it without depending on line numbers or other easy-to-change details.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: