Re: Planet posting policy
От | Selena Deckelmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planet posting policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN1EF+xo4LkBnyvEWkapjqBEp_vSy8G0K54HJwZTczR0oFskBQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planet posting policy (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Planet posting policy
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > I think there could be value in having both a strictly focused planet > and a more broader one. But I wouldn't want to *replace* the former by > the latter. It is interesting, but the policy about "postgres-relevant" helps avoid conflicts about content of other types. I don't want to get more into the business of fielding questions about appropriateness of content on a more general feed, or censoring inappropriate content. Or, honestly, defining what appropriate would be on a broader planet. Seems like an epic bikeshedding opportunity. -selena -- http://chesnok.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: