Re: The case for version number inflation
От | Selena Deckelmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The case for version number inflation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN1EF+x79rJG=69Qz1sz+qoENkMbSabrsxFYDJMwr3yxFVBz1w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The case for version number inflation (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The case for version number inflation
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
Selena,It's on the TODO list. It's just really hard to implement, especially
> This seems like a case to be made for Postgres to respond more elegantly to
> this situation, possibly by converting blocks on the fly to the newer
> version of the database for writes and being ok with reading previous
> versions of blocks, or simply not writing data to the filesystem when the
> versions don't match.
if you consider the combinational challenge.
One step at a time. :)
Postgres won't start up if the binaries don't match the data ... unless
someone has written a script which replaces the pg_control file :-(
Seems like we could make that mechanism more robust :)
-selena
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: