Re: The case for version number inflation
От | Selena Deckelmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The case for version number inflation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN1EF+wqjcEz91udUQBQSgEmPmAoEEM10vr+HTThJNuckD4_mg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The case for version number inflation (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The case for version number inflation
Re: The case for version number inflation Re: The case for version number inflation |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
I'll not weigh in on the version number inflation. Seems like a lot of epic bikeshedding.
-selena
And you're probably aware of the issue with Amazon Linux, where they
don't distinguish between version 9.1 and 9.2 and thus corrupt people's
databases.
This seems like a case to be made for Postgres to respond more elegantly to this situation, possibly by converting blocks on the fly to the newer version of the database for writes and being ok with reading previous versions of blocks, or simply not writing data to the filesystem when the versions don't match.
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: